[Pulp-dev] Revising PUPs

David Davis daviddavis at redhat.com
Mon Jul 9 11:49:07 UTC 2018

I’ve opened a PR with the process on how to revise a PUP. Reviews/feedback
are welcome:


I’d also like to call a vote on this proposed change. Here’s the voting
model from PUP-1:

+1: "Will benefit the project and should definitely be adopted."
+0: "Might benefit the project and is acceptable."
-0: "Might not be the right choice but is acceptable."
-1: "I have serious reservations that need to be thought through and

Deadline will be July 22, 2018.


On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 11:14 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:

> While there is a process for revising PUPs before they are accepted[0], we
> don’t have any process for revising PUPs after they are accepted. I’d like
> to upate PUP-1[1] to create a simple but formal process for revising
> accepted PUPs.
> I was thinking we should add a section (“Revising an Accepted PUP”) that
> says say revising a PUP follows the same process as creating a new PUP.
> This includes an initial discussion period followed by a PR against the PUP
> with the proposed change. After that, there should be a vote decided by our
> existing lazy consensus model.
> Thoughts?
> [0] https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md#revision
> [1] https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md
> David
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20180709/0af4302b/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list