[Pulp-dev] Revising PUPs

[Ina Panova]

+1



--------
Regards,

Ina Panova
Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.

"Do not go where the path may lead,
 go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."

On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Dana Walker <dawalker at redhat.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> Dana Walker
>
> Associate Software Engineer
>
> Red Hat
>
> <https://www.redhat.com>
> <https://red.ht/sig>
>
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:05 AM, Daniel Alley <dalley at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Milan Kovacik <mkovacik at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey David,
>>>
>>> thanks, +1
>>>
>>> --
>>> milan
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 1:49 PM, David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I’ve opened a PR with the process on how to revise a PUP.
>>>> Reviews/feedback are welcome:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/pulp/pups/pull/11
>>>>
>>>> I’d also like to call a vote on this proposed change. Here’s the voting
>>>> model from PUP-1:
>>>>
>>>> +1: "Will benefit the project and should definitely be adopted."
>>>> +0: "Might benefit the project and is acceptable."
>>>> -0: "Might not be the right choice but is acceptable."
>>>> -1: "I have serious reservations that need to be thought through and
>>>> addressed."
>>>>
>>>> Deadline will be July 22, 2018.
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 11:14 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> While there is a process for revising PUPs before they are
>>>>> accepted[0], we don’t have any process for revising PUPs after they are
>>>>> accepted. I’d like to upate PUP-1[1] to create a simple but formal process
>>>>> for revising accepted PUPs.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was thinking we should add a section (“Revising an Accepted PUP”)
>>>>> that says say revising a PUP follows the same process as creating a new
>>>>> PUP. This includes an initial discussion period followed by a PR against
>>>>> the PUP with the proposed change. After that, there should be a vote
>>>>> decided by our existing lazy consensus model.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> [0] https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md#revision
>>>>> [1] https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md
>>>>>
>>>>> David
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20180711/dd1c0ff2/attachment.htm>