[Pulp-dev] Revising PUPs

[David Davis]

Good catch. I added a short sentence saying the version number should be
incremented by 1.

David


On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 9:29 AM Austin Macdonald <amacdona at redhat.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> I suggested an addition, to increment the PUP version whenever a change is
> made. I considered suggesting a version scheme to indicate major and minor
> changes, but AFAICT there isn't a practical need beyond a simple integer.
> If the process is too cumbersome for typo fixing (for example), we can
> adjust it later.
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>>
>> --------
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ina Panova
>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>>
>> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Dana Walker <dawalker at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Dana Walker
>>>
>>> Associate Software Engineer
>>>
>>> Red Hat
>>>
>>> <https://www.redhat.com>
>>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:05 AM, Daniel Alley <dalley at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Milan Kovacik <mkovacik at redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey David,
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks, +1
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> milan
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 1:49 PM, David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I’ve opened a PR with the process on how to revise a PUP.
>>>>>> Reviews/feedback are welcome:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/pulp/pups/pull/11
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I’d also like to call a vote on this proposed change. Here’s the
>>>>>> voting model from PUP-1:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1: "Will benefit the project and should definitely be adopted."
>>>>>> +0: "Might benefit the project and is acceptable."
>>>>>> -0: "Might not be the right choice but is acceptable."
>>>>>> -1: "I have serious reservations that need to be thought through and
>>>>>> addressed."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Deadline will be July 22, 2018.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 11:14 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While there is a process for revising PUPs before they are
>>>>>>> accepted[0], we don’t have any process for revising PUPs after they are
>>>>>>> accepted. I’d like to upate PUP-1[1] to create a simple but formal process
>>>>>>> for revising accepted PUPs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was thinking we should add a section (“Revising an Accepted PUP”)
>>>>>>> that says say revising a PUP follows the same process as creating a new
>>>>>>> PUP. This includes an initial discussion period followed by a PR against
>>>>>>> the PUP with the proposed change. After that, there should be a vote
>>>>>>> decided by our existing lazy consensus model.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [0] https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md#revision
>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> David
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20180720/16933e31/attachment.htm>