[Pulp-dev] Pulp 2 plugin release plan

[Dennis Kliban]

On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com> wrote:

> Dennis,
> thank you for sending out the summary of our meeting.
>
> Just to highlight and check the overall understanding -  there will be one
> repository per Y pulp release which might contain multiple Z and Y plugin
> version releases.
> Correct me if i am wrong.
>
>
That is correct.



> What would be our next steps in terms of collaboration with the build team?
>
>
>
My understanding was that Patrick is planning to do some investigation and
report back on this thread. Please correct me if I am wrong.


>
> --------
> Regards,
>
> Ina Panova
> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>
> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 8:20 PM, Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Earlier today a few of us met to discuss how we can release new Y
>> releases of plugins without a Y release of the platform accompanying them.
>>
>> The initial proposal was to publish a new Y release of a plugin at the
>> same time as a Z release of platform and other plugins. More concretely, we
>> were discussing putting pulp-docker-* 3.2.0 packages into the 2.16
>> repository[0]. This repository currently contains 3.1.3 packages.
>> Publishing 3.2.0 packages to this repository would completely remove the
>> 3.1.3 pulp-docker packages. Since 3.1.3 pulp-docker-* packages were only
>> published to the 2.16 repository, the only 3.1.z package available after a
>> publish of 3.2.0 would be 3.1.2 in the 2.15 repository[1]. After
>> identifying this problem, we decided to NOT release pulp-docker-* 3.2.0
>> with the 2.16.2 z-stream release.
>>
>> In order to eliminate this problem in the future, we would like to
>> investigate if it will be possible to compose repositories with new Y
>> releases of plugins while retaining the previous versions of packages that
>> were already published to the repository before. If this is possible, we
>> would try to start composing our Z stream repositories in such a way
>> starting with 2.17.0 release.
>>
>> Questions? Thoughts? Ideas?
>>
>>
>> [0] https://repos.fedorapeople.org/pulp/pulp/stable/2.16/7Server/x86_64/
>> [1] https://repos.fedorapeople.org/pulp/pulp/stable/2.15/7Server/x86_64/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20180619/1ba54c56/attachment.htm>