[Pulp-dev] 'id' versus 'pulp_id' on Content

Daniel Alley dalley at redhat.com
Fri Jun 29 15:19:56 UTC 2018


>
> Base URLs should never change. That's an expectation that all web
> application clients everywhere should be able to rely on.


Isn't changing the hostname something that downstream explicitly supports?
(I could be wrong here, I'm only recollecting random chats from months ago).

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Jeremy Audet <jaudet at redhat.com> wrote:

> Base URLs should never change. That's an expectation that all web
> application clients everywhere should be able to rely on. "Cool URIs don't
> change." If anything, storing IDs is the worse practice, because that
> implies that the client is going to use pre-existing knowledge to locally
> build URLs, instead of asking Pulp for the URLs it needs.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20180629/5e1a94db/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list