[Pulp-dev] 'id' versus 'pulp_id' on Content

David Davis daviddavis at redhat.com
Fri Jun 29 16:13:31 UTC 2018


That’s correct. Katello has made it quite clear we have to support users
changing hostnames/port/etc.

David


On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:21 AM Daniel Alley <dalley at redhat.com> wrote:

> Base URLs should never change. That's an expectation that all web
>> application clients everywhere should be able to rely on.
>
>
> Isn't changing the hostname something that downstream explicitly
> supports?  (I could be wrong here, I'm only recollecting random chats from
> months ago).
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Jeremy Audet <jaudet at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Base URLs should never change. That's an expectation that all web
>> application clients everywhere should be able to rely on. "Cool URIs don't
>> change." If anything, storing IDs is the worse practice, because that
>> implies that the client is going to use pre-existing knowledge to locally
>> build URLs, instead of asking Pulp for the URLs it needs.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20180629/d9ac65a7/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list