[Pulp-dev] Uniqueness constraints on Content in Pulp 3
gmbnomis at gmail.com
Tue Nov 13 22:59:30 UTC 2018
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 02:38:33PM -0500, David Davis wrote:
> I want to point out that the RPM example is not correct. RPMs are
> unique in Pulp by checksum (aka pkgId in our code and createrepo_c):
> Therefore Pulp can store two packages with the same
> name-epoch-version-arch (NEVRA) as you would in the case where there is
> a signed and unsigned RPM with the same NEVRA.
I missed that pkgId is the former Pulp 2 checksum. Thanks for
pointing that out!
Thus, pulp_rpm seems to be in the "pulp_file camp" as well. Does
pulp_rpm prevent that two such packages (same NEVRA, different
checksum) end up in one repo version/one publication?
More information about the Pulp-dev