[Pulp-dev] Removing PublishedArtifact?

Matthias Dellweg dellweg at atix.de
Tue Sep 18 08:43:40 UTC 2018

Not entierly sure, that this is related, but a while ago, we laid out a
road map for the pulp3_deb plugin [1]. It includes 8 different
publishers, that publish different metadata for the same repository
version. As far as i understand, that is exactly, what
PublishedArtifacts are for. If it were possible to just use ordinary
Artifacts and associate them with a Publication instead of a
RepositoryVersion it might be ok in that context.

Cheers, Matthias

[1] https://etherpad.net/p/pulp-deb-pulp3/timeslider#2902

On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:45:15 -0400
Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com> wrote:

> A plugin writer (@oleksander) pointed out to me that PublishedArtifact
> seems a bit out of place for his usage. I can see why he thinks that,
> and after thinking about it, Pulp does seem a bit over-complicated in
> this area. I've written [0] to describe the problem, promote
> discussion of this issue, and hopefully decide on a resolution.
> [0]: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4020
> Discussion and collaboration is welcome!
> -Brian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20180918/3a43cc6f/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list