[Pulp-dev] Pulp 3 tag

Brian Bouterse bbouters at redhat.com
Fri Apr 12 20:23:09 UTC 2019


+1 to making a 'Pulp 2' tag


On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:16 PM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:

> I’ve been thinking through this and I think there are 3 steps to perform:
>
> 1. Create a Pulp 2 tag
> 2. Assign the Pulp 2 tag to issues not tagged with Pulp 3
> 3. Remove the Pulp 3 tag
>
> Does that make sense? If so, I’d like to perform 1 and create the Pulp 2
> tag in the next few days so we can start adding it to issues.
>
> I’ll follow up with more concrete plans for steps 2 and 3 next week.
>
> David
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:10 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Cool, I will try to think through how to transition and we can discuss at
>> the team meeting Monday.
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:04 AM Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 to create a pulp2 tag after mass-close
>>>
>>>
>>> --------
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Ina Panova
>>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>>>
>>> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>>>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 3:48 PM Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Great idea David!
>>>>
>>>> Once we get through tomorrow's mass-close, let's plan a transition to
>>>> remove the Pulp3 tag and introduce a Pulp 2 tag instead.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:34 AM Dana Walker <dawalker at redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Dana Walker
>>>>>
>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>>
>>>>> Red Hat
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://www.redhat.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:22 AM Daniel Alley <dalley at redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I feel like using the Pulp 3 tag is suboptimal since we are closing
>>>>>>> out most of our Pulp 2 issues and a majority of the new bugs/tasks/stories
>>>>>>> are for Pulp 3. Wouldn’t it make more sense to create a Pulp 2 tag and use
>>>>>>> it on the rare Pulp 2 issues that get filed?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Agreed, +1 to having a "Pulp 2" tag to replace the Pulp 3 tag.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:19 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I feel like using the Pulp 3 tag is suboptimal since we are closing
>>>>>>> out most of our Pulp 2 issues and a majority of the new bugs/tasks/stories
>>>>>>> are for Pulp 3. Wouldn’t it make more sense to create a Pulp 2 tag and use
>>>>>>> it on the rare Pulp 2 issues that get filed?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> David
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 8:27 AM Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 to handle tag during the triage process
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --------
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ina Panova
>>>>>>>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>>>>>>>>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:53 PM Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 to Tanya's suggestion.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also I have an action item to start a separate thread on how we
>>>>>>>>> can plan-and-then-close all pulp2 bugs that we are not actively working on.
>>>>>>>>> I wanted to mention it here to identify it as a possible resolution to this
>>>>>>>>> issue since it was related. I'll send this today.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:54 AM Tatiana Tereshchenko <
>>>>>>>>> ttereshc at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In my opinion, it's a part of triage or grooming process.
>>>>>>>>>> Triage leader (for issues) and a person who grooms the task
>>>>>>>>>> should pay attention to the tags.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Tanya
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:47 PM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Looking in redmine at our current sprint, I see several issues
>>>>>>>>>>> that don’t have Pulp 3 tag that should. Here are some:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4587
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4587>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4595
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4595>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4577
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4577>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4576
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4576>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4545
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4545>Talking with the QE team,
>>>>>>>>>>> it’s difficult for them to get a feel for how much Pulp 2 vs Pulp 3 work
>>>>>>>>>>> there is. I guess we could try to get better about tagging issues when we
>>>>>>>>>>> create them?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> However, at least one issue is by someone outside the core Pulp
>>>>>>>>>>> team and I am not sure community members will know to tag their issues w/
>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp 3 tag. Are there any other alternatives to ensuring Pulp 3 issues get
>>>>>>>>>>> properly tagged?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> David
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20190412/554b9175/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list