[Pulp-dev] Pulp 3 tag

Fri Apr 12 20:28:13 UTC 2019

Pulp2 tag sounds great to me.

On Fri, Apr 12, 2019, 16:23 Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com> wrote:

> +1 to making a 'Pulp 2' tag
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:16 PM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> I’ve been thinking through this and I think there are 3 steps to perform:
>>
>> 1. Create a Pulp 2 tag
>> 2. Assign the Pulp 2 tag to issues not tagged with Pulp 3
>> 3. Remove the Pulp 3 tag
>>
>> Does that make sense? If so, I’d like to perform 1 and create the Pulp 2
>> tag in the next few days so we can start adding it to issues.
>>
>> I’ll follow up with more concrete plans for steps 2 and 3 next week.
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:10 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Cool, I will try to think through how to transition and we can discuss
>>> at the team meeting Monday.
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:04 AM Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 to create a pulp2 tag after mass-close
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Ina Panova
>>>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>>>>
>>>> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>>>>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 3:48 PM Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Great idea David!
>>>>>
>>>>> Once we get through tomorrow's mass-close, let's plan a transition to
>>>>> remove the Pulp3 tag and introduce a Pulp 2 tag instead.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:34 AM Dana Walker <dawalker at redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dana Walker
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Red Hat
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://www.redhat.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:22 AM Daniel Alley <dalley at redhat.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I feel like using the Pulp 3 tag is suboptimal since we are closing
>>>>>>>> out most of our Pulp 2 issues and a majority of the new bugs/tasks/stories
>>>>>>>> are for Pulp 3. Wouldn’t it make more sense to create a Pulp 2 tag and use
>>>>>>>> it on the rare Pulp 2 issues that get filed?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Agreed, +1 to having a "Pulp 2" tag to replace the Pulp 3 tag.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:19 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I feel like using the Pulp 3 tag is suboptimal since we are closing
>>>>>>>> out most of our Pulp 2 issues and a majority of the new bugs/tasks/stories
>>>>>>>> are for Pulp 3. Wouldn’t it make more sense to create a Pulp 2 tag and use
>>>>>>>> it on the rare Pulp 2 issues that get filed?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> David
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 8:27 AM Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 to handle tag during the triage process
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --------
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ina Panova
>>>>>>>>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>>>>>>>>>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:53 PM Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 to Tanya's suggestion.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Also I have an action item to start a separate thread on how we
>>>>>>>>>> can plan-and-then-close all pulp2 bugs that we are not actively working on.
>>>>>>>>>> I wanted to mention it here to identify it as a possible resolution to this
>>>>>>>>>> issue since it was related. I'll send this today.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:54 AM Tatiana Tereshchenko <
>>>>>>>>>> ttereshc at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In my opinion, it's a part of triage or grooming process.
>>>>>>>>>>> Triage leader (for issues) and a person who grooms the task
>>>>>>>>>>> should pay attention to the tags.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Tanya
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:47 PM David Davis <
>>>>>>>>>>> daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Looking in redmine at our current sprint, I see several issues
>>>>>>>>>>>> that don’t have Pulp 3 tag that should. Here are some:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4587
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4587>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4595
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4595>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4577
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4577>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4576
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4576>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4545
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4545>Talking with the QE team,
>>>>>>>>>>>> it’s difficult for them to get a feel for how much Pulp 2 vs Pulp 3 work
>>>>>>>>>>>> there is. I guess we could try to get better about tagging issues when we
>>>>>>>>>>>> create them?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> However, at least one issue is by someone outside the core Pulp
>>>>>>>>>>>> team and I am not sure community members will know to tag their issues w/
>>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp 3 tag. Are there any other alternatives to ensuring Pulp 3 issues get
>>>>>>>>>>>> properly tagged?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> David
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20190412/2e268846/attachment.htm>