[Pulp-dev] Pagination Requirements and Defaults?
daviddavis at redhat.com
Tue Aug 20 17:06:12 UTC 2019
#3801 only describes the move from CursorPagination to
PageNumberPagination. I don't think we considered
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 1:01 PM Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 12:17 PM Brian Bouterse <bmbouter at redhat.com>
>> Recently with pulp_ansible, users were interested in using pagination
>> with LimitOffsetPagination . Pulp currently defaults to
>> PageNumberPagination. I looked at our current DRF defaults, and I noticed
>> two things.
>> 1. We default to the not-as-common PageNumberPagination based on examples
>> in the drf docs.
>> 2. We customize it here  in various ways.
>> Can someone help me remember why these pagination style choices were made
>> or where the requirements came from?
> I believe the motivation is described here:
>> Would our bindings work with a LimitOffsetPagination style?
> Yes, the bindings will work with anything that uses query parameters for
>> What use cases drove the use and customization in this area?
>> Also, @katello how would a pagination style change (like switching to
>> LimitOffsetPagination) affect you?
>> Thanks for any info you can provide. Maybe what we have right now is just
>> what we need, but I'm not sure.
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pulp-dev