[Pulp-dev] Pagination Requirements and Defaults?

Justin Sherrill jsherril at redhat.com
Wed Aug 21 14:27:11 UTC 2019

On 8/20/19 12:17 PM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
> Recently with pulp_ansible, users were interested in using pagination 
> with LimitOffsetPagination [0]. Pulp currently defaults to 
> PageNumberPagination. I looked at our current DRF defaults, and I 
> noticed two things.
> 1. We default to the not-as-common PageNumberPagination based on 
> examples in the drf docs.
> 2. We customize it here [1] in various ways.
> Can someone help me remember why these pagination style choices were 
> made or where the requirements came from?
> Would our bindings work with a LimitOffsetPagination style?
> What use cases drove the use and customization in this area?
> Also, @katello how would a pagination style change (like switching to 
> LimitOffsetPagination) affect you?

Speaking for katello, we'd have to change a few lines of code, but it 
seems like it would be minimal.

> Thanks for any info you can provide. Maybe what we have right now is 
> just what we need, but I'm not sure.
> -Brian
> [0]: 
> https://www.django-rest-framework.org/api-guide/pagination/#setting-the-pagination-style
> [1]: 
> https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/blob/master/pulpcore/app/pagination.py
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20190821/f45c9435/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list