[Pulp-dev] Renaming Content 'artifact' to '_artifact'

Austin Macdonald amacdona at redhat.com
Mon Jan 7 15:13:10 UTC 2019

We have single-artifact Content in Docker as well. I've gone ahead and
named the field _artifact.

Given that single-artifact Content is likely to be a very common pattern
among plugins, maybe it would be best to add this as a mixin for pulpcore.
If that's the future of this field, we should definitely make it _artifact.

On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 12:24 PM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:

> In most plugins, Content only has a single artifact so we created a
> virtual field 'artifact' that we expose to end users. In a recent
> change[0], we prefixed the Content fields with underscores ('_') so we're
> considering renaming the field to '_artifact' to be consistent with other
> plugins that have '_artifacts' on Content. We could use some feedback by
> sprint planning (Jan 4) either here or on the issue:
> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4282
> [0] https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4206
> David
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20190107/ceb98a80/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list