[Pulp-dev] Namespacing plugins, looking for feedback

Austin Macdonald amacdona at redhat.com
Tue Jan 8 17:22:25 UTC 2019

On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 12:12 PM Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com> wrote:

> My understanding is that it's for both. It would be dropped from app_label
> and that will automatically be used in master/detail urls. Is that what
> others thought?
> This seems like the simplest approach to me. My only concern with this
approach is making sure that the database will be properly namespaced so
there won't be collisions with other applications that use postgres like
Katello. AFAIK, the plugin tables don't need to be namespaced since they
are already in the "pulp" database. Is that correct? If so, +1.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20190108/d91ddf8d/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list