[Pulp-dev] pulplift with source installs for developers

Dennis Kliban dkliban at redhat.com
Fri Jan 11 16:14:40 UTC 2019


Thanks for putting this together. After checking out your PRs I was able to
provision a development environment. Everything worked as expected. I'd
like to see us switch to these developer environments next week.

Has anyone else had a chance to try it out?

On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 6:10 PM Dana Walker <dawalker at redhat.com> wrote:

> I have some initial PRs [0][1][2] up for using pulplift to create a
> development environment for pulp3 as described in 4243. [3]  Please take a
> look and provide feedback on any changes we might want to make.  Feel free
> to discuss what we'd like to see here or comment directly on the PRs.
>
> Note, I haven't added the requirements for building the docs yet, so that
> update will come tomorrow, but I wanted to get this out here and start
> hearing from all of you.
>
> [0] https://github.com/pulp/ansible-pulp3/pull/61
> [1] https://github.com/ehelms/pulplift/pull/3
> [2] https://github.com/pulp/pulp/pull/3824
> [3] https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4234
>
> Thanks!
>
> --Dana
>
> Dana Walker
>
> Associate Software Engineer
>
> Red Hat
>
> <https://www.redhat.com>
> <https://red.ht/sig>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 8:34 PM Eric Helms <ehelms at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> The current setup would have each individual configure custom boxes to
>> suit their needs. If there was a fairly common setup for location of source
>> code and mount options we could update the source boxes or create a set of
>> boxes designed for mounting by default to make spinning up easier.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 4:58 PM Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Brian! This looks like exactly what we need.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 4:54 PM Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> pulplift itself relies heavily on "forklift" which itself has some good
>>>> docs. Take a look at these docs and see if it generates new questions.
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/theforeman/forklift#using-sshfs-to-share-folders
>>>> https://github.com/theforeman/forklift#adding-custom-boxes
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We currently use Vagrant directly to create our development
>>>>> environment[0]. I would like to be able to use pulplift to create a
>>>>> development environment for Pulp 3. Our current Vagrantfile uses SSHFS to
>>>>> mount source code on the host onto the vagrant box[1]. This allows
>>>>> developers to make changes locally on their laptop and the same code to run
>>>>> inside the vagrant box.
>>>>>
>>>>> pulplift already provides boxes named 'pulp3-source-*'. These boxes
>>>>> use a playbook[2] from ansible-pulp3 repo to perform the installation. By
>>>>> default, this playbook assumes that the vagrant box has pulp source code at
>>>>> "/home/vagrant/devel/pulp". However, without the synced folders, the
>>>>> source code is not there and the install fails.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to extend pulplift to use synced folders for the source
>>>>> install boxes. However, I am not sure where to add such directives for
>>>>> vagrant.
>>>>>
>>>>> Eric, can you point me in the right direction?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [0] https://github.com/pulp/devel/blob/master/Vagrantfile.example
>>>>> [1] https://github.com/pulp/devel/blob/master/Vagrantfile.example#L8
>>>>> [2]
>>>>> https://github.com/pulp/ansible-pulp3/blob/master/source-install.yml
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20190111/8cccb4b9/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list