[Pulp-dev] QE commit bit

David Davis daviddavis at redhat.com
Tue Jan 15 19:14:28 UTC 2019

I agree. I think devs can merge changes to pulp-smash tests in pulp repos
but they should get it reviewed by QE before merging--which, as Kersom
says, we've been doing.


On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 2:11 PM Kersom <kersom at redhat.com> wrote:

> David, thanks for driving this.
> I agree with your suggestions Robin.
> All currently present on [1] should have commit bit for those repos.
> I think it is fine to the devs to have commit to the test repos, just to
> communicate QE in case of test changes. We already have a system in place
> on git.
> [1] https://github.com/orgs/pulp/teams/qe
> Thanks,
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 11:07 AM Robin Chan <rchan at redhat.com> wrote:
>> A few suggestions.
>> #1. QE good with [1] - you all agree these are the folks with commit bit?
>> In other words, you trust each other to do the merge with your own
>> agreements of who has expertise and when things are ready - all the details?
>> #2. I would suggest we are suggesting QE have commit bit access to the
>> specific subdirectories;
>>   a) pulp_file/pulp_file/tests/functional/ (in pulp/pulp_file repo)
>>   b) pulp/pulp_core/tests/functional/ (in pulp/pulp repo)
>> I know this is not enforceable via the GIT settings, but helpful to be
>> explicit about as we include this in agreement.
>> #3. Shall we also agree that those not in [1] - in other words, the
>> developers give up commit bit for #2. Can still contribute but don't need
>> to be involved in #1 agreements.
>> Fully supportive of this effort. I was one of the folks who gave my word
>> prior to PUP-6 and see this as making sure the folks have what they need to
>> get stuff done and keeping decision making with the folks closest to the
>> work (i.e. QE makes decisions about all things QE.)
>> Thanks,
>> Robin
>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:37 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>> When we moved the pulp-smash tests out of the pulp-smash repository, we
>>> promised to give QE ownership of the smash tests within the Pulp
>>> repositories on github. I know we have a process in place to give the
>>> commit bit to contributors[0] but this promise predates PUP-6.
>>> Thus, I'd like to ask for feedback on giving the QE team in github[1]
>>> the commit bit to the following repositories in order to merge changes to
>>> smash tests:
>>> pulp/pulp
>>> pulp/pulp_file
>>> I'd also like to ask plugin teams to consider giving QE commit access to
>>> their repositories if they have pulp-smash tests that are maintained by QE.
>>> Feedback would be appreciated. I'll like to set an deadline of January
>>> 30th.
>>> Thanks.
>>> [0] https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0006.md
>>> [1] https://github.com/orgs/pulp/teams/qe
>>> David
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20190115/312ad679/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list