[Pulp-dev] [Pulp-list] Pulp 3 RC info

[Austin Macdonald]

>
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 8:45 AM Bryan Kearney <bkearney at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> -- pulp-list
>>
>> RC for a year? That seems way long. I get the idea of semanti=c
>> versioning, but is there any other path for that?
>>
>>
We haven't really discussed this idea, so this is just me talking:
Another possible path would be to GA much sooner with a high likelihood of
a Pulp 4 (and maybe 5) in the next year. This would be a more normal way to
go IMO, but I'd hate to spook downstream.



> --bk
>>
>> On 1/30/19 5:28 PM, David Davis wrote:
>> > We’re approaching an RC release of Pulp 3.0 and we’ve put together a
>> > blog post with some information about this release:
>> >
>> > https://pulpproject.org/2019/01/30/pulp-3-rc-information/
>> >
>> > Please feel free to respond to this email with any questions, comments,
>> > or concerns you have about the RC.
>> >
>> > David
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Pulp-list mailing list
>> > Pulp-list at redhat.com
>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20190131/277f52dc/attachment.htm>