[Pulp-dev] Require Django 2.2+ and PostgreSQL 9.6
bbouters at redhat.com
Tue Jul 23 14:41:39 UTC 2019
+1 to adopting the Django 2.2 since it's an LTS. We should get a ticket
written for it.
In terms of the installer, I think only CentOS current doesn't have 9.6+.
I'm working on getting the installer to installer 9.6 via scl on CentOS 7
now and I think I'm almost done https://pulp.plan.io/issues/5147
We also need to document this requirement change (and the mariaDB dropping)
in the docs. At some point later we could consider a runtime version check
where Pulp refuses to migrate/start if PostgreSQL version < 9.6.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:35 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:
> +1. I wonder how we require a minimum version of PostgreSQL though? Will
> that be a documentation change or is there some way to require it
> programmatically (e.g. in the pulp 3 installer)?
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:28 AM Tatiana Tereshchenko <ttereshc at redhat.com>
>> Any objections to require Django 2.2+? And PostgreSQL 9.6+?
>> It's not clear yet which Django will be in Centos8 or EPEL 8, if any.
>> But I was told by package maintainers that if it's added, then it will
>> likely be an LTS version, so Django 2.2
>> One of the nice features 2.2 offers is ignore_conflicts option for
>> bulk_create which will be helpful for the migration tool
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pulp-dev