[Pulp-dev] Require Django 2.2+ and PostgreSQL 9.6

David Davis daviddavis at redhat.com
Wed Jul 24 15:01:05 UTC 2019


That all sounds good to me. It might be nice to file issues about these
other pieces of work but my main concern right now is unblocking Katello.

David


On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:55 AM Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 6:56 AM Tatiana Tereshchenko <ttereshc at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Great!
>> I'm sure I checked it but somehow missed it, thanks :)
>> I think it will be useful in the future to sent a note to #pulp-dev about
>> such changes (in case, it hasn't been done).
>>
>> Brian, are you adding postgresql 9.6 requirement/installation to Centos 7
>> part of installer only or everywhere?
>>
> I'm adding it only to the installer. I got that working but it's unmerged
> still ( https://github.com/pulp/ansible-pulp/pull/129 ). We need to
> document the postgreSQL requirement also here (
> https://docs.pulpproject.org/en/3.0/nightly/installation/instructions.html#database-setup
> ) which I wasn't planning to do right now.
>
> Do we need another ticket to install postgress 9.6+ for other OS?
>>
> I think we're ok for now once my centos fix is merged. If it was for any
> other OS it would be for Debian and someone else will need to do that.
> Fedora uses PostgreSQL 10.8 so that is OS is all set.
>
>
>> Tanya
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 5:24 PM Daniel Alley <dalley at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> We've already adopted Django 2.2 several months ago (in setup.py), so
>>> I'm not sure if any action item is needed there
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:42 AM Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 to adopting the Django 2.2 since it's an LTS. We should get a ticket
>>>> written for it.
>>>>
>>>> In terms of the installer, I think only CentOS current doesn't have
>>>> 9.6+. I'm working on getting the installer to installer 9.6 via scl on
>>>> CentOS 7 now and I think I'm almost done
>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/5147
>>>>
>>>> We also need to document this requirement change (and the mariaDB
>>>> dropping) in the docs. At some point later we could consider a runtime
>>>> version check where Pulp refuses to migrate/start if PostgreSQL version <
>>>> 9.6.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:35 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1. I wonder how we require a minimum version of PostgreSQL though?
>>>>> Will that be a documentation change or is there some way to require it
>>>>> programmatically (e.g. in the pulp 3 installer)?
>>>>>
>>>>> David
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:28 AM Tatiana Tereshchenko <
>>>>> ttereshc at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Any objections to require Django 2.2+? And PostgreSQL 9.6+?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not clear yet which Django will be in Centos8 or EPEL 8, if any.
>>>>>> But I was told by package maintainers that if it's added, then it
>>>>>> will likely be an LTS version, so Django 2.2
>>>>>> https://www.djangoproject.com/download/#supported-versions
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One of the nice features 2.2 offers is ignore_conflicts option for
>>>>>> bulk_create which will be helpful for the migration tool
>>>>>> https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.2/ref/models/querysets/#django.db.models.query.QuerySet.bulk_create
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20190724/508d44b5/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list