[Pulp-dev] Pulp 2 and 3 Service Name Clashes

[Dana Walker]

As I understand the discussion on 4497, it was to be hyphens *in addition
to* a name change, but you're right @ehelms that I only see the hyphen
change.

I'm +1 on @rchan's suggestion that the change take place in pulp2.

Also given the migration and complexities with support, I agree with
@ehelms that custom configuration of these names would be problematic, so
I'm -0 on this unless we have a compelling user story for needing the
customizability (assuming we are making the change to the service names in
pulp2 ourselves).

--Dana

Dana Walker

Associate Software Engineer

Red Hat

<https://www.redhat.com>
<https://red.ht/sig>


On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 1:06 PM Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com> wrote:

> I agree with @rchan that we will require users to upgrade to  a minimal
> version of Pulp 2 before they can upgrade to Pulp 3.
>
> We should just rename Pulp 2 services in a future release of Pulp 2.
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:31 AM Eric Helms <ehelms at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Howdy,
>>
>> In some migration of Pulp 2 to Pulp 3 cases, both will need to be ran
>> side-by-side on the same box. Given that pulp workers and pulp resource
>> manager are the same concept in both, this leads to their systemd resources
>> being named the same (or in today's case so slightly different enough you
>> can't tell them apart).
>>
>> I'd like to propose a change to the service names to facilitate this
>> situation.
>>
>>
>> Option 1: Include Pulp version in Pulp 3 services
>>
>> Example: pulp3-resource-manager
>>
>> Pro: Explicit naming and understanding of new services.
>>
>> Con: This locks services names to Pulp version, which will be odd with
>> semantic versioning if 4 or 5 comes along.
>>
>>
>> Option 2: Re-name Pulp 2 services to pulp2-
>>
>> Example: pulp2-resource-manager
>>
>> Pro: Explicitly identifies pulp2 services, easy to retro-fit by users
>> onto their setups or through RPM releases.
>>
>> Con: Requires users to have upgraded to at least a particular Pulp2
>> version to migrate to Pulp 3 (this may be required anyway).
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20190304/c6b7b13f/attachment.htm>