[Pulp-dev] Nomenclature Clarification

[Eric Helms]

Thanks for the feedback. I should know this, but if I wanted to propose an
official change to the nomenclature what is the correct process?

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:47 AM Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:34 AM Eric Helms <ehelms at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Howdy,
>>
>> Within Pulp 3, I've found myself struggling to refer to the pieces of the
>> runtime deployment and wanted to raise a few questions I keep coming back
>> to.
>>
>>  1) Per [1], pulpcore seems to reference the entirety of the server,
>> workers and resource manager that live within the repository at [2]. Is
>> that correct?
>>
>
> Yes, that is what pulpcore means.
>
>
>>  2) What is the 'server' called? I keep wanting to call it the
>> 'pulp-api-server' or 'pulp-api-app' or 'pulp-api'.
>>
>>
> I like the name pulp-rest-api or pulp-api.
>
>
>>
>> - Eric
>>
>> [1]
>> https://docs.pulpproject.org/en/3.0/nightly/glossary.html#term-pulpcore
>> [2] https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20190313/582bde2f/attachment.htm>