[Pulp-dev] Nomenclature Clarification

Dennis Kliban dkliban at redhat.com
Wed Mar 13 14:58:22 UTC 2019


Discuss it here.
Get support for the change.
Open ticket on pulp.plan.io.
Submit a PR.

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:52 AM Eric Helms <ehelms at redhat.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the feedback. I should know this, but if I wanted to propose an
> official change to the nomenclature what is the correct process?
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:47 AM Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:34 AM Eric Helms <ehelms at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Howdy,
>>>
>>> Within Pulp 3, I've found myself struggling to refer to the pieces of
>>> the runtime deployment and wanted to raise a few questions I keep coming
>>> back to.
>>>
>>>  1) Per [1], pulpcore seems to reference the entirety of the server,
>>> workers and resource manager that live within the repository at [2]. Is
>>> that correct?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, that is what pulpcore means.
>>
>>
>>>  2) What is the 'server' called? I keep wanting to call it the
>>> 'pulp-api-server' or 'pulp-api-app' or 'pulp-api'.
>>>
>>>
>> I like the name pulp-rest-api or pulp-api.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> - Eric
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://docs.pulpproject.org/en/3.0/nightly/glossary.html#term-pulpcore
>>> [2] https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20190313/7357289e/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list