[Pulp-dev] pulp_file ownership

David Davis daviddavis at redhat.com
Mon Mar 25 17:35:17 UTC 2019


I think there is a consensus to having the core team own pulp_file. Could
someone with Github admin permissions add the pulp_file repo to the core
team and delete the pulp_file team?

David


On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:33 AM Robin Chan <rchan at redhat.com> wrote:

> That would be everyone.
> Make is so.
> I am assuming this means the core team already has enough expertise to own
> the file plugin, If anyone believes that not to be the case let me know how
> I can help support cross training efforts.
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 9:21 AM Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 9:04 AM Daniel Alley <dalley at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:16 AM Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 to moving pulp_file to the core team
>>>>
>>>> We should also remove the 'File' team on github with this change, since
>>>> it won't be a thing anymore. For those with Pulp org permissions that is
>>>> here:  https://github.com/orgs/pulp/teams/file
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 6:48 AM Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 for the core team
>>>>>
>>>>> ср, 20 мар. 2019 г., 9:06 Tatiana Tereshchenko <ttereshc at redhat.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 move the pulp_file repo under the core team
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:10 PM Austin Macdonald <
>>>>>> amacdona at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 for the latter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since some changes to pulpcore or pulpcore-plugin also require
>>>>>>> changes to pulp_file (anything backwards incompatible) everyone on the core
>>>>>>> team needs to be able to quickly make changes to pulp_file as well. (And
>>>>>>> vice versa.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 5:04 PM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> With @jortel having left the Pulp team, the people with a commit
>>>>>>>> bit to pulp_file is down to just @dkliban and I. I don't think this is
>>>>>>>> enough. We could either add more people to the pulp_file team or just move
>>>>>>>> the pulp_file repo under the core team. I am leaning toward the latter. Any
>>>>>>>> objections?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> David
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20190325/46d782d6/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list