[Pulp-dev] Testing Epic for Distribution / AutoDistribution

[Brian Bouterse]

@QE I filed another test case which covers the last gap, PublishedArtifact.
The test proposes we use the Debian plugin since it's the only plugin I
know of that has PublishedArtifact usage. I'm not sure if it's feasible,
but I wanted to file it anyway so the testing plan has no gaps. It is
missing some details, but when you go to actually work on it I can provide
some commands then. They could change slightly some so I think providing
them when you go to write the test would be the most efficient.

FYI it's here:  https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4861

I also related it to the epic:  https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4838

Any questions, or feedback is welcome.

On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 10:10 AM Matthias Dellweg <dellweg at atix.de> wrote:

> On Fri, 17 May 2019 15:44:32 -0400
> Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > We removed some functional tests recently from core because the
> > Distribution part of Master/Detail was so heavily reworked. We want to
> > rethink the testing in this area with new functional tests, so I
> > wrote out a testing epic here:  https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4838
> >
> > @qe, can you read these stories and ask any questions? Note that it's
> > possible some of these tests are already written; I wanted to
> > explicitly capture what needed to be tested without thinking about
> > what you've already implemented.
> >
> > Note this does *not* plan testing to verify the correct serving of
> > PublishedArtifacts. Do any plugins use PublishedArtifacts?
> >
> > All the best,
> > Brian
>
> The Debian plugin uses PublishedArtifact. If i understand correctly, it
> is needed to be able to serve the same Artifact with different
> relative_paths in different Repos/Publication, and also to select which
> Files belong to a Publication, and which one should be skipped.
>
> Have a nice Weekend, Matthias
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20190521/6c148816/attachment.htm>