[Pulp-dev] Repo version validation

Dennis Kliban dkliban at redhat.com
Tue Oct 8 14:45:37 UTC 2019


The plan outlined in 3541 solves the problem in a way that gives plugin
writers a lot of control. +1 to implementing it.

On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 12:23 PM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:

> We have a blocker for Pulp 3.0 GA[0] that we need to address soon in order
> to let plugins leverage it in their upcoming GA releases. It involves
> allowing plugin writers to validate content in a repo version. It's
> somewhat related to validating uniqueness in a repo version[1] except there
> are cases other than uniqueness that plugins might want to handle. One
> example might be a case where we want to prevent a user from adding a
> docker tag that points to a manifest outside a repo from getting added to
> the repo. I'm not sure if this is an actual example but it gives you an
> idea that there might be other non-unique validation plugin writers might
> want to add.
>
> Brian proposed a solution on 3541 that I think solves the problem[2]. I
> was hoping to maybe get some feedback on it so we could proceed by October
> 9.
>
> [0] https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3541
> [1] https://pulp.plan.io/issues/5008
> [2] https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3541
>
> David
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20191008/d3e36ca7/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list