[Pulp-dev] RPM plugin meeting notes

[Tatiana Tereshchenko]

Pulp 3:

   -

   Query for items to be done for Katello release
   https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp_rpm/issues?query_id=149
   -

      Priorities for Katello from the items which are not merged
      -

         Checksum type configuration for a publication
         - more tests added
            - ready for review
         -

         Kickstart copy
         -

            https://pulp.plan.io/issues/5207 - POST, awaiting review
            -

         Issue with advisory checksum type
         -

            https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/pull/1667
            -

            proceed with the string representation
            -

            ready for review
            -

   Import/export
   -

      On track for a first pass for pulpcore 3.3
      -

      Hope to have RPM integration by then or shortly thereafter
      -

      Need feedback about how to handle content dependencies
      -

         https://www.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/2020-April/msg00015.html
         -

   Features
   -

      Publish layout Packages + Opensuse support
      -

         Merged
         -

      Advisory version is considered at conflict resolution time
      -

         Advisory doesn't seem to be checked for conflicts at upload time
         (with repository specified)
         - ppicka to test thoroughly if it's the case
         -

      Mirror metadata discussion, aka "relative_path" problem
      -

         Bump email discussion next week


Pulp 2:

   -

    for the RPM migration to Pulp 3
   -

      https://pulp.plan.io/issues/6354
      -

      https://pulp.plan.io/issues/6355
      -

      Need to fix it next week
      -

   CentOS directory KS structure is no longer RH compatible
   -

      https://pulp.plan.io/issues/6470
      -

      need someone to look at it next week
      -

      potentially a problem with pulp2 only (hopefully)


Open PRs:

   -

   https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/pulls


Triage:

   -

   Un-triaged bugs https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp_rpm/issues?query_id=30


Tests:

   - Pulp 3 https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp_rpm/issues?query_id=153
      - Opinions differ on how good the current test coverage is
      - Need to find a way to identify gaps, hopefully work on coverage
      report will be back on track soon
      - Focus on tests after 3.3, no capacity to look at it right now
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20200409/b9b42ba9/attachment.htm>