[Pulp-dev] MODIFIED issues

Ina Panova ipanova at redhat.com
Tue Apr 21 12:13:32 UTC 2020


Comments inline.


--------
Regards,

Ina Panova
Senior Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.

"Do not go where the path may lead,
 go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."


On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 2:41 PM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:

> During the pulpcore team meeting last week, we noted that after the latest
> pulpcore release there were a number of issues in redmine still at
> MODIFIED. I took an action item to go through them and they seem to fall
> into four categories:
>
> 1. Issues that got filed against pulpcore but were fixed in a plugin
>
> I think that item 1 is worth trying to fix by automation. The commit
> validation could check that the issue project for the attached issue
> matches the repo. I have a proof of concept here:
>
> https://github.com/pulp/plugin_template/pull/209
>
> +1

2. Issues without code changes (eg tasks, epics, etc) getting set to
> MODIFIED upon completion
> 3. Issues that got pulled/reverted before the release went out
>
> Optimally, we'd set these to CLOSED when they are completed. I think the
> release person could also check though. I'd propose we add a step to the
> release guide that asks the release person to clean up any items at
> MODIFIED after releasing.
>
> +1 to that, I had the same thought.

4. Issues against the installer and plugin_template.
>
> I would also make sure that they are in a closed state after the release.

Looking for feedback on what to do with these.
>
> David
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20200421/727e6997/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list