[Pulp-dev] github checklist as a part of the release process

David Davis daviddavis at redhat.com
Wed Aug 19 15:01:33 UTC 2020


A separate github repo might make sense. Right now our release scripts live
inside our .travis folders in repo. I don't know that they are project
specific so perhaps we could move them to this new repo?

David


On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 5:57 AM Tatiana Tereshchenko <ttereshc at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Would a separate github repo with issues enabled make sense?
> One place for all templates if we need many (I can think of at least Y and
> Z releases).
> One place for all release tracking, one can see what is released, and what
> is not, without going from repo to repo (or from one redmine project to
> another).
> This repo can also have release compatibility information/table, or any
> other release related data.
>
> I'm also not aware of any easy way of creating a template/checklist in
> redmine.
>
> Tanya
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 4:22 PM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Big +1. I really like this idea and believe it could help us organize the
>> work for releases.
>>
>> How we can apply this to Pulp though? We don't use github issues and
>> there's no way to template checklists for redmine issues AFAICT.
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 9:55 AM Fabricio Aguiar <
>> fabricio.aguiar at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I like the idea,
>>> maybe it is possible to automate when closing the issue, triggering a
>>> github action
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Fabricio Aguiar
>>> Software Engineer, Pulp Project
>>> Red Hat Brazil - Latam <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>> +55 11 999652368
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 8:55 AM Tatiana Tereshchenko <
>>> ttereshc at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I learned recently how Fedora CoreOS folks do their releases and I
>>>> really like their process.
>>>> I think something similar can be useful for Pulp. We already have ~15
>>>> steps in our release guide
>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/Pulp3_Release_Guide> and it's
>>>> without some pre/post-release steps, like release announcement
>>>> collaboration, writing blog posts, etc.
>>>>
>>>> The idea is simple.
>>>> Have a checklist template (for each type of release if needed).
>>>> Create a github issue with this checklist and mark it as you perform
>>>> the steps.
>>>> In addition post any relevant links as comments.
>>>> Here is the example
>>>> https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-streams/issues/158
>>>>
>>>> Benefits:
>>>>  - release progress is open and transparent to everyone, including our
>>>> community
>>>>  - it's easy to look at the history if needed
>>>>  - release "guide" is always up to date
>>>>  - if one started a release and can't finish for some reason (e.g. end
>>>> of working day in their time zone), another one can take over
>>>>  - keeps a release person more organized (those who released many times
>>>> sometimes perform steps by memory and might forget some small steps; often
>>>> people multitask and do something while waiting for the builds to be done.
>>>> Our release guide serves the same purpose but one needs to consciously go
>>>> back to it, here it requires you to click the checkbox.)
>>>>
>>>> Cons:
>>>>   - a potential downside is that it's one more action to do and a new
>>>> process to follow. Though it should be very close to the release guide, so
>>>> I hope it does not add much to our processes, it should not feel like
>>>> something new :)
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Tanya
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20200819/b4ba9447/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list