[Pulp-dev] Bindings' limitations

[Grant Gainey]

The whole point to having generated bindings is to prevent a client-tool
from passing bogus data into Pulp, failing early and loudly so the
client-author can *fix their code/assumptions*. Yes, that does make it hard
to use the generated bindings to test bad-data-cases - but to me, that's
just the price to be paid for the bindings doing the right thing in the
real-world case of "I'm trying to write a tool to use Pulp, not to break
it".

I would be *very* hesitant to make changes that make it easier to sneak
"bad data" through the bindings-interfaces.

Just my $0.02
G
-- 
Grant Gainey
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat System Management Engineering
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20200212/c38ccf75/attachment.htm>