[Pulp-dev] Moving pulp_gem

David Davis daviddavis at redhat.com
Thu Feb 13 15:51:07 UTC 2020

FYI, pulp_gem has been moved to the Pulp org. I feel like we should maybe
clarify in the future which plugins belong under the Pulp org but the
general consensus among Pulp members is we should move it and I didn't want
to hold back transferring pulp_gem.


On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:27 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:

> Can I ask the motivation for moving pulp_gem to the pulp org? I was
> actually thinking we should maybe consider moving plugins out of the Pulp
> org to alleviate the stress on resources such as Travis.
> If we decide to move pulp_gem into the Pulp org, I'll be happy to do the
> leg work.
> David
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:39 AM Matthias Dellweg <dellweg at atix.de> wrote:
>> I would like to suggest to move the pulp_gem plugin to the pulp
>> namespace on GH.
>> What do you all think?
>> Who should i ask for help to perform the transfer?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20200213/e250e9dc/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list