[Pulp-dev] RPM plugin meeting notes

[Tatiana Tereshchenko]

Pulp 3:

   -

   Support repos with primary.xml only
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627372
   -

      Question is whether to support them or not?
      -

         Probably no, David will comment on the BZ and close in a week if
         there is no disagreement.
         -

         Old issue/discussion https://pulp.plan.io/issues/1287#note-9
         -

   Copy work
   -

      RPM-only depsolving now working
      -

      Libsolv packaged as Python package, querying if upstream is
      interested in the work at all
      -

      Next items:
      -

         Support module & module default depsolving <- Daniel
         -

         Support “standard” advanced copy w/ RPMs referenced by Errata,
         PackageGroups
         -

         Support multi-repo copy
         -

         Support copy by unit href <-David
         -

   pulp_rpm_prerequisites relicensing PR
   <https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm_prerequisites/pull/32>
   -

      semi-urgent because we want to publish an actual version to Galaxy
      <https://galaxy.ansible.com/pulp/pulp_rpm_prerequisites>
      -

      Only 1 author missing review or “I affirm” message: bmbouter (on PTO)
      -

      About half of people wrote “I affirm the re-licensing” or similar.
      -

      Plan to go to rchan after all reviews


Pulp 2:

   -

     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1784165
   -

      Patch ready, needs to be tested
      -

      GA blocker


Open PRs:

   -

   https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/pulls
   -

   good job on closing/merging PRs



Triage:
Un-triaged bugs https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp_rpm/issues?query_id=30
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20200213/c535e85a/attachment.htm>