[Pulp-dev] Moving pulp_gem

[Brian Bouterse]

I'm glad we moved pulp_gem. My personal perspective is that the Pulp
organization on Github is useful to consolidate activity of the Pulp
community. It's more visible to various other communities and users which
is a good thing. Projects and plugins are free to host anywhere, but any
project that wants to be moved in to the Github org and makes sense for the
Pulp community should be able to. This is my personal take.

This may create some challenges with our CI so we'll see how my philosophy
holds up after we transition to Github Actions for some of the workload.

On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:28 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:

> Can I ask the motivation for moving pulp_gem to the pulp org? I was
> actually thinking we should maybe consider moving plugins out of the Pulp
> org to alleviate the stress on resources such as Travis.
>
> If we decide to move pulp_gem into the Pulp org, I'll be happy to do the
> leg work.
>
> David
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:39 AM Matthias Dellweg <dellweg at atix.de> wrote:
>
>> I would like to suggest to move the pulp_gem plugin to the pulp
>> namespace on GH.
>> What do you all think?
>>
>> Who should i ask for help to perform the transfer?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20200218/f4898401/attachment.htm>