[Pulp-dev] Name uniqueness problem in Pulp 3 REST API
ggainey at redhat.com
Tue Jul 21 12:27:13 UTC 2020
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 8:14 AM Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com> wrote:
> Does anyone else have an opinion? If not, I am going to start by writing a
> task to remove this name uniqueness constraint for repositories.
Import/export relies on non-pulp_id-uniqueness to identify Things. I was
assuming we were talking about adding pulp_type to the Repository
uniqueness-constraint, so that a given name/type would be unique (which
would require a single change to RepositoryResource
If we're talking about just removing the uniqueness-constraint altogether,
then life gets a lot harder.
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat System Management Engineering
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pulp-dev