[Pulp-dev] Draft Community Demo - Your Opinion Please

Melanie Corr mcorr at redhat.com
Fri Jul 24 16:59:06 UTC 2020


I just saw the email subject. Total mislabel on my part :-O
Demo! I meant survey. Luckily it is just the draft.
https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5


Ar Aoine 24 Iúil 2020 ag 17:47, scríobh Robin Chan <rchan at redhat.com>:

>
> Robin Chan
>
> She/Her/Hers
>
> Satellite Software Engineering Manager - Pulp
>
> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com>
>
> IRC: rchan
>
> Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to
> answer this email out of your office hours.
> <https://www.redhat.com>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:32 PM Melanie Corr <mcorr at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Ar Déar 23 Iúil 2020 ag 17:35, scríobh David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com
>> >:
>>
>>> Thanks for working on this. Responses inline below.
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:55 AM Melanie Corr <mcorr at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I need your help in shaping the survey[0].
>>>>
>>>> I copied over some questions from last year's survey and added what I
>>>> thought might be interesting. Last year's survey contains a lot of
>>>> "planning" questions for future upgrades to Pulp 3. Many things have
>>>> changed since then, and I think you know best where we need to focus.
>>>>
>>>> I added conditions to the survey to try and separate the following:
>>>>
>>>> * Questions for Pulp 2 Users
>>>> * Questions for Pulp 3 Users
>>>> * Questions for people who are in-between their migration. This last
>>>> category of user may exist only in my head. Let me know :)
>>>>
>>>
>>>> Questions for you:
>>>>
>>>> Do you think streaming the survey into separate user groups like this
>>>> is a good idea?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is it possible though to compare the results across surveys (like what
>>> OS people are using)?
>>>
>> It's the same survey, with sections that redirect for Pulp 2 users or
>> Pulp 3 users.
>> I had to think about this. The answer was yes but with added work.
>> To avoid extra processing of answers, I added the generic questions (OS,
>> size, etc) to one section while keeping conditional Pulp 2 and Pulp 3
>> sections.
>> If someone in the Pulp 2 section answers that they have installed Pulp 3,
>> they also get redirected to the Pulp 3 section afterward so they can give
>> their opinion on that :)
>> Am happy to apply any feedback.
>>
>
> Gotcha. Ok, that could be nice for the user - skip questions that aren't
> relevant to them.
>
>
>>
>>
>
>>>> [0]
>>>> https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5
>>>>
>>>
>> This link is live. Take a look :)
>>
>> I also applied Matthias's feedback and added timeline options for when
>> users plan to upgrade to Pulp 2.
>> There's a duplication of a question "Where are you located" in the first
>> and last section. I deleted it but it is still there. If it doesn't go
>> away, I'll create a new survey when we are happy with the questions.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Melanie Corr, RHCE
>>>>
>>>> Community Manager
>>>>
>>>> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com>
>>>>
>>>> Remote, Ireland
>>>>
>>>> mcorr at redhat.com
>>>> M: +353857774436     IM: mcorr
>>>> <https://www.redhat.com>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Melanie Corr, RHCE
>>
>> Community Manager
>>
>> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com>
>>
>> Remote, Ireland
>>
>> mcorr at redhat.com
>> M: +353857774436     IM: mcorr
>> <https://www.redhat.com>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>

-- 

Melanie Corr, RHCE

Community Manager

Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com>

Remote, Ireland

mcorr at redhat.com
M: +353857774436     IM: mcorr
<https://www.redhat.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20200724/4b2d0add/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list