[Pulp-dev] Installer project
mikedep333 at redhat.com
Fri May 8 19:10:46 UTC 2020
+1 to the plan.
(We discussed this at PulpCon too, and concluded this.)
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 9:55 AM Brian Bouterse <bmbouter at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 10:48 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:
>> During triage today, a majority of the issues that came up were for the
>> installer but only a handful of people could really speak to these issues.
>> I proposed that we skip these issues during triage and let the installer
>> team triage them.
> I agree with this observation, a triage where not everyone can speak to
> issues isn't a good use of time. Overall I wonder if having an all-hands
> triage makes sense anymore given the mini-teams organization these days.
>> In order to do so, we'd have to create a separate project in redmine. My
>> initial feeling is that this makes sense since the installer work has
>> really grown into its own project and is no longer in the purview of
> What about us reconfiguring the triage query to disinclude issues with the
> installer tag on them as an alternative?
>> I'll put a deadline on this discussion for May 8 unless we don't reach a
>> consensus by then.
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
He / Him / His
Service Reliability Engineer, Pulp
Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pulp-dev