[Pulp-dev] Installer project

[Mike DePaulo]

+1 to the plan.

(We discussed this at PulpCon too, and concluded this.)

On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 9:55 AM Brian Bouterse <bmbouter at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 10:48 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> During triage today, a majority of the issues that came up were for the
>> installer but only a handful of people could really speak to these issues.
>> I proposed that we skip these issues during triage and let the installer
>> team triage them.
>>
> I agree with this observation, a triage where not everyone can speak to
> issues isn't a good use of time. Overall I wonder if having an all-hands
> triage makes sense anymore given the mini-teams organization these days.
>
>>
>> In order to do so, we'd have to create a separate project in redmine. My
>> initial feeling is that this makes sense since the installer work has
>> really grown into its own project and is no longer in the purview of
>> pulpcore.
>>
> What about us reconfiguring the triage query to disinclude issues with the
> installer tag on them as an alternative?
>
>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> I'll put a deadline on this discussion for May 8 unless we don't reach a
>> consensus by then.
>>
>> David
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>


-- 

Mike DePaulo

He / Him / His

Service Reliability Engineer, Pulp

Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/>

IM: mikedep333

GPG: 51745404
<https://www.redhat.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20200508/46fa8a60/attachment.htm>