[Pulp-dev] Installer project

Brian Bouterse bmbouter at redhat.com
Wed May 13 20:35:53 UTC 2020


At today's installer meeting, the installer team agreed to:
* keep the installer items in the pulpcore Redmine and not have a separate
Redmine for it
* Add a Component named 'Installer'. New installer items should be filed
with that component set. [done]
* A new saved query has been created to show installer items:
https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/issues?query_id=156 [done]
* The triage query was updated to disinclude Installer items [done]
* Existing items with the 'Pulp 3 Installer' tag had that tag removed (but
others left) and Component=Installer set [done]
* The 'Pulp 3 Installer' was removed [done]


On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:23 AM Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com> wrote:

>
> --------
> Regards,
>
> Ina Panova
> Senior Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>
> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 3:55 PM Brian Bouterse <bmbouter at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 10:48 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> During triage today, a majority of the issues that came up were for the
>>> installer but only a handful of people could really speak to these issues.
>>> I proposed that we skip these issues during triage and let the installer
>>> team triage them.
>>>
>> I agree with this observation, a triage where not everyone can speak to
>> issues isn't a good use of time. Overall I wonder if having an all-hands
>> triage makes sense anymore given the mini-teams organization these days.
>>
>
>>> In order to do so, we'd have to create a separate project in redmine. My
>>> initial feeling is that this makes sense since the installer work has
>>> really grown into its own project and is no longer in the purview of
>>> pulpcore.
>>>
>> What about us reconfiguring the triage query to disinclude issues with
>> the installer tag on them as an alternative?
>>
>
> It feels like there will be less traction and confusion ( whether to open
> an issue against pulp or installer project) if we add an installer tag,
> however the installer team would need to make sure that installer issues
> have the tag before the triage so they do get filtered out.
>
>
>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> I'll put a deadline on this discussion for May 8 unless we don't reach a
>>> consensus by then.
>>>
>>> David
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20200513/53fcbbb3/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list