[Pulp-dev] Travis pricing

[David Davis]

We looked at Fedora's Zuul instance before and decided against using it for
two reasons: (A) it'd be a lot of work/maintaince (eg we'd have to write
our own zuul jobs, bring our own compute resource, etc), and (B) we were
worried about the support since it's not a paid (or freemium) option.

That said, it might be worth considering again if nothing else for testing
on specific environments such as selinux which is difficult to do on hosted
CI providers.

David


On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 3:51 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 3:35 PM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Travis recently announced changes to their plan pricing that will impact
> open-source projects such as Pulp[0]. It's likely that we'll exhaust the
> monthly budget that Travis is going to give OSS projects and we're not sure
> how generous Travis will be giving out extra build minutes.
> >
> > Given our concern, members of the CI team met today to discuss our
> options. We have some notes[1] from our meeting about some of the options
> that stood out to us. We'd like to have a plan in place when the new
> pricing gets rolled out to our organization.
> >
> > Any feedback is welcome.
> >
> > [0] https://blog.travis-ci.com/2020-11-02-travis-ci-new-billing
> > [1] https://hackmd.io/n6kStnNiTPGekAWGdNvbhA
>
> Could we use the Fedora CI Zuul instance[2]? There's already a ton of
> other projects using one of the Zuul instances on
> softwarefactory-project.io, and leveraging the Fedora CI
> infrastructure could also help future efforts in doing auto-release to
> Fedora for Pulp releases, too.
>
> [2]: https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/projects
>
> --
> 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20201104/3447e939/attachment.htm>