[Pulp-dev] Travis pricing

David Davis daviddavis at redhat.com
Mon Nov 9 15:26:11 UTC 2020

I looked a little bit more into Gitlab CI this morning. If my understanding
is correct, their cap is 50,000 minutes. Right now, we're using about
44,000 minutes in Travis[0]. Some of our jobs (eg pulp_installer, pulp-cli,
etc) are on GHA already so in theory if we moved everything over to Gitlab
CI, we could potentially hit their cap?

[0] https://travis-ci.com/github/pulp?tab=insights


On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 8:18 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:

> We looked at Fedora's Zuul instance before and decided against using it
> for two reasons: (A) it'd be a lot of work/maintaince (eg we'd have to
> write our own zuul jobs, bring our own compute resource, etc), and (B) we
> were worried about the support since it's not a paid (or freemium) option.
> That said, it might be worth considering again if nothing else for testing
> on specific environments such as selinux which is difficult to do on hosted
> CI providers.
> David
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 3:51 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 3:35 PM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Travis recently announced changes to their plan pricing that will
>> impact open-source projects such as Pulp[0]. It's likely that we'll exhaust
>> the monthly budget that Travis is going to give OSS projects and we're not
>> sure how generous Travis will be giving out extra build minutes.
>> >
>> > Given our concern, members of the CI team met today to discuss our
>> options. We have some notes[1] from our meeting about some of the options
>> that stood out to us. We'd like to have a plan in place when the new
>> pricing gets rolled out to our organization.
>> >
>> > Any feedback is welcome.
>> >
>> > [0] https://blog.travis-ci.com/2020-11-02-travis-ci-new-billing
>> > [1] https://hackmd.io/n6kStnNiTPGekAWGdNvbhA
>> Could we use the Fedora CI Zuul instance[2]? There's already a ton of
>> other projects using one of the Zuul instances on
>> softwarefactory-project.io, and leveraging the Fedora CI
>> infrastructure could also help future efforts in doing auto-release to
>> Fedora for Pulp releases, too.
>> [2]: https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/projects
>> --
>> 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20201109/ecc04886/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list