[Pulp-dev] Pulp Installers Team Meeting Minutes 2020-09-09

Mike DePaulo mikedep333 at redhat.com
Wed Sep 9 17:19:01 UTC 2020

September 9th Agenda

   - [mikedep333] I want to say that the rest of the subteam was right
   about something from ~3 months ago. It was best not to create a branch
   supporting CI for pulp_installer. The effort would not have paid off.
   - We cannot run CentOS 8 molecule containers on our Fedora 32 systems
   right now. service/systemd module fails:
      - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853407
      - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853736#c8
      - switching to systemd module does not help
      - Can we ask RHEL8 for a fix?
      - agreed: Just run molecule on a VM
   - CI is red on source-upgrade: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7479
      - try pipdeptree
      - try
   - What is needed from the installer to support smooth roll out of
   https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/pull/799 ?
      - Created installer subtask.
   - how docker changes can affect us? (Free plan – anonymous users: 100
   pulls per 6 hours ) -
      - agreed: This will probably break many projects, so they might
      revert. Travis/GHA may also have a cache. So let’s address this later. We
      can consider Quay if it is more reliable then.
   - How Mike responded to the user email about RPMs install
      - Team thinks it was good to spend time investigating, for the user’s
      sake, for the sake of other users, and to look into the underlying issues
      (we want to find out about them early in CI, not when users report.)


Mike DePaulo

He / Him / His

Service Reliability Engineer, Pulp

Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/>

IM: mikedep333

GPG: 51745404
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20200909/36112fba/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list