[Pulp-dev] RBAC: Secure by default?

[David Davis]

+1 from me.

David


On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 8:28 AM Ina Panova <ipanova at redhat.com> wrote:

> +1 to the change.
>
>
> --------
> Regards,
>
> Ina Panova
> Senior Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>
> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 8:14 PM Tanya Tereshchenko <ttereshc at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> It sounds like a good idea,  and additional +1 that it doesn't break
>> things.
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 5:57 PM Matthias Dellweg <mdellweg at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In today's pulpcore meeting, we discussed that any endpoint that is not
>>> aware of RBAC yet will be open to every authenticated user.
>>>
>>> The suggestion that was given, is that we change that default. So all
>>> endpoints will raise permission errors unless RBAC opens them up.
>>> This would not affect any existing installation, where we only allowed
>>> the use of a single admin user. And by circumventing the permission
>>> framework this special user will remain to be able to talk to all available
>>> endpoints without restrictions.
>>> On the other hand it should smooth out the transition period until we
>>> have RBAC in all places. Since you could start giving permissions to users
>>> for viewsets that have an access_policy, while not risking to give them
>>> access to other sensitive parts that don't have it yet.
>>>
>>> What do you all think?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20210106/065c233f/attachment.htm>