[Pulp-dev] [Pulp-list] Github Discussions

[Brian Bouterse]

I did this also for the pulpcore meeting:
https://github.com/pulp/community/discussions/8

My format was a little different, but the same idea.

On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:13 AM Grant Gainey <ggainey at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 9:40 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Based on feedback, I've moved discussions to its own repo:
>> https://github.com/pulp/community/discussions.
>>
>
> Brillliant!
>
> One discovery I made this week - for 'Meetings' threads that exist to have
> meeting-minutes posted, the first entry should be a description of what the
> meeting you're recording is for, and each set of minutes should be a
> comment. This lets the reader sort by "Newest" and get
> most-recent-minutes-first.The initial message in a discussion is always at
> the top, no matter how you sort - so if it's your first meeting-minutes,
> they'll always be first.
>
> I redid the katello/pulp and community/pulp integration discussion-threads
> (in their new location) in light of this, apologies to anyone who got some
> notification-spam as a result this morning.
>
>    - https://github.com/pulp/community/discussions/7
>    - https://github.com/pulp/community/discussions/4
>
> G
>
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 1:49 PM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We've heard from the community about the amount of friction involved in
>>> getting help with Pulp and one of the areas I think we could improve is
>>> user communications. We currently run two mailing lists: pulp-list and
>>> pulp-dev.
>>>
>>> At today's open floor meeting, we talked about using Github's new
>>> Discussions feature[0] to host these conversations instead. I've set up a
>>> Discussion against pulpcore[1] for us to try but here's also an example of
>>> a project that has a lot of threads[2].
>>>
>>> I think the consensus was that we'd just keep pulpcore as our one and
>>> only Github Discussions instance, which would serve as a replacement for
>>> pulp-list and pulp-dev. I'd propose that we try this out for a bit and
>>> eventually decommission our mailing lists.
>>>
>>> [0] https://docs.github.com/en/discussions
>>> [1] https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/discussions
>>> [2] https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-list mailing list
>> Pulp-list at redhat.com
>> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>
>
>
> --
> Grant Gainey
> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat System Management Engineering
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20210603/0edddd55/attachment.htm>