[Pulp-dev] [Pulp-list] Github Discussions
daviddavis at redhat.com
Wed Jun 16 15:54:45 UTC 2021
Yesterday at open floor, we discussed decommissioning pulp-dev list in
favor of of using Github Discussions for developer discussions.
If there are no objections, I plan to decommission the pulp-dev list next
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 11:01 AM Brian Bouterse <bmbouter at redhat.com> wrote:
> I did this also for the pulpcore meeting:
> My format was a little different, but the same idea.
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:13 AM Grant Gainey <ggainey at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 9:40 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Based on feedback, I've moved discussions to its own repo:
>> One discovery I made this week - for 'Meetings' threads that exist to
>> have meeting-minutes posted, the first entry should be a description of
>> what the meeting you're recording is for, and each set of minutes should be
>> a comment. This lets the reader sort by "Newest" and get
>> most-recent-minutes-first.The initial message in a discussion is always at
>> the top, no matter how you sort - so if it's your first meeting-minutes,
>> they'll always be first.
>> I redid the katello/pulp and community/pulp integration
>> discussion-threads (in their new location) in light of this, apologies to
>> anyone who got some notification-spam as a result this morning.
>> - https://github.com/pulp/community/discussions/7
>> - https://github.com/pulp/community/discussions/4
>>> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 1:49 PM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>>>> We've heard from the community about the amount of friction involved in
>>>> getting help with Pulp and one of the areas I think we could improve is
>>>> user communications. We currently run two mailing lists: pulp-list and
>>>> At today's open floor meeting, we talked about using Github's new
>>>> Discussions feature to host these conversations instead. I've set up a
>>>> Discussion against pulpcore for us to try but here's also an example of
>>>> a project that has a lot of threads.
>>>> I think the consensus was that we'd just keep pulpcore as our one and
>>>> only Github Discussions instance, which would serve as a replacement for
>>>> pulp-list and pulp-dev. I'd propose that we try this out for a bit and
>>>> eventually decommission our mailing lists.
>>>>  https://docs.github.com/en/discussions
>>>>  https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/discussions
>>>>  https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions
>>> Pulp-list mailing list
>>> Pulp-list at redhat.com
>> Grant Gainey
>> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat System Management Engineering
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pulp-dev