[Pulp-dev] Pulp Installers Team Meeting Minutes

[Mike DePaulo]

Forgot to add an important line:

## March 10 Agenda
* ansible 3
    * POC - https://github.com/pulp/pulp_installer/pull/545
    * CI requiring a removed scenario
    * support from 2.9 to 3.0? Or keep with the latest 2 releases (2.10,
3)?
        * [mikedep333] Definitely drop 2.8, added comment to PR on how to
do that.
        * [mikedep333] Let's keep 2.9 for now, due to confusion over new
version scheme, irregular pip upgrade process to 2.10, and to distros often
having 2.9.
* runtime metadata
    * https://github.com/pulp/pulp_installer/pull/540
    * currently not enforced, but it helps as a hint
    * [mikedep333] Awesome!
* https://pulp.plan.io/issues/8186
    * ppicka cannot reproduce it on a CentOS 7 VM
    * [mikedep333] Such a simple fix, so let's just add `become:true` and
add a comment that on some environments, it is necessary.
* Warnings about GHA upgrading ubuntu-latest to Ubuntu 20.04 soon
(plugin-template and pulp_installer)
    * [mikedep333] IIRC, on 1/20 we agreed that because our repos are
mostly compatible with 20.04, we will cross that bridge when we get to it.
    * fao89 just confirmed that pulp_installer is compatible, as well as
all but 1 of the rest of his forks. (His forks are on 20.04, GHA is doing a
rolling release.) The sole incompatible repo is pulp-operator.
    * [mikedep333] We should upgrade pulp_installer, easier than
plugin-template, with no plugin scripts.

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 9:41 AM Mike DePaulo <mikedep333 at redhat.com> wrote:

> ## March 10 Agenda
> * ansible 3
>     * POC - https://github.com/pulp/pulp_installer/pull/545
>     * CI requiring a removed scenario
>     * support from 2.9 to 3.0? Or keep with the latest 2 releases (2.10,
> 3)?
>         * [mikedep333] Definitely drop 2.8, added comment to PR on how to
> do that.
> * runtime metadata
>     * https://github.com/pulp/pulp_installer/pull/540
>     * currently not enforced, but it helps as a hint
>     * [mikedep333] Awesome!
> * https://pulp.plan.io/issues/8186
>     * ppicka cannot reproduce it on a CentOS 7 VM
>     * [mikedep333] Such a simple fix, so let's just add `become:true` and
> add a comment that on some environments, it is necessary.
> * Warnings about GHA upgrading ubuntu-latest to Ubuntu 20.04 soon
> (plugin-template and pulp_installer)
>     * [mikedep333] IIRC, on 1/20 we agreed that because our repos are
> mostly compatible with 20.04, we will cross that bridge when we get to it.
>     * fao89 just confirmed that pulp_installer is compatible, as well as
> all but 1 of the rest of his forks. (His forks are on 20.04, GHA is doing a
> rolling release.) The sole incompatible repo is pulp-operator.
>     * [mikedep333] We should upgrade pulp_installer, easier than
> plugin-template, with no plugin scripts.
>
> --
>
> Mike DePaulo
>
> He / Him / His
>
> Service Reliability Engineer, Pulp
>
> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> IM: mikedep333
>
> GPG: 51745404
> <https://www.redhat.com/>
>


-- 

Mike DePaulo

He / Him / His

Service Reliability Engineer, Pulp

Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/>

IM: mikedep333

GPG: 51745404
<https://www.redhat.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20210310/86423921/attachment.htm>