[Pulp-dev] Removing pulp-smash from PyPI

Ina Panova ipanova at redhat.com
Mon Mar 29 20:30:45 UTC 2021


+1 Thank you!

On Mon, 29 Mar 2021, 18:24 David Davis, <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:

> I've heard back from most stakeholders that no one's using pulp-smash
> outside of the Pulp team. And I am not seeing any objections to removing it
> from PyPI.
>
> I plan to remove it from PyPI after April 5th unless anyone objects.
>
> Here are PRs to update projects:
>   - https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/pull/1210
>   - https://github.com/pulp/pulp_file/pull/486
>   - https://github.com/pulp/pulp_container/pull/275
>   - https://github.com/pulp/pulp_deb/pull/257
>   - https://github.com/pulp/pulp_ansible/pull/549
>   - https://github.com/pulp/plugin_template/pull/359
>
> David
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 12:16 PM Pavel Picka <ppicka at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> I agree to remove it from PyPI and use only "source" if needed.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 4:52 PM Brian Bouterse <bmbouter at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm +1 to this plan and the removal of pulp-smash from PyPI.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:26 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, that's the plan. Sorry I didn't mention that in my email.
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:23 AM Mike DePaulo <mikedep333 at redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It's declared in many plugins' test dependencies without the git path,
>>>>> such as pulp_file/functest_requirements.txt
>>>>>
>>>>> I often install those as part of my installer development, and support
>>>>> for other teams.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I agree with this approach, but update the plugins too.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Mike
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:16 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It recently came up that the pulp-smash release PyPI is badly out of
>>>>>> date. It's an extra burden to release it and it doesn't seem to have any
>>>>>> benefit. So instead we're considering using the git repo directly (see [0])
>>>>>> but I wanted to first check if that's a problem for anyone?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [0] https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/pull/1210
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike DePaulo
>>>>>
>>>>> He / Him / His
>>>>>
>>>>> Service Reliability Engineer, Pulp
>>>>>
>>>>> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>>>>
>>>>> IM: mikedep333
>>>>>
>>>>> GPG: 51745404
>>>>> <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Pavel Picka
>> Red Hat
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20210329/62c5ec41/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list