<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05/23/2018 06:20 AM, Brian Bouterse
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAAcvrTEJ_RbN=pnHXm6VO4E=V2rzV+P18D89B1eXTfOQdnMShQ@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>It sounds like there isn't much blocking this, but does
          that mean the devs should go ahead with planning and making
          the branching changes?</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Also I want to confirm: is the scope of this planned change
          only for pulp/pulp and pulp/devel repos for now?</div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Agreed.<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAAcvrTEJ_RbN=pnHXm6VO4E=V2rzV+P18D89B1eXTfOQdnMShQ@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
                          <div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 22, 2018
                            at 10:56 AM, Patrick Creech <span dir="ltr"><<a
                                href="mailto:pcreech@redhat.com"
                                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">pcreech@redhat.com</a>></span>
                            wrote:<br>
                            <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
                              style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px
                              #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span
                                class="">On Mon, 2018-05-21 at 19:51
                                -0400, Dennis Kliban wrote:<br>
                                > We need to start planning the
                                creation of  a "2.17-dev" branch from
                                the current master and merging "3.0-dev"
                                into "master". We would then create new
                                "2.Y-dev" branch after each "2.Y.0"
                                release. All<br>
                                > 3.0 work would then land on
                                master.  <br>
                                <br>
                              </span>Might I suggest a y-version
                              agnostic 2-dev or 2-master or similar
                              branch instead?  This would reflect better
                              the state of the branch as "Pulp 2 master"
                              and will prevent us from having to rename
                              a lot<br>
                              of items each release. <br>
                            </blockquote>
                            <div>+1 to this naming.<br>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    +1<br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAAcvrTEJ_RbN=pnHXm6VO4E=V2rzV+P18D89B1eXTfOQdnMShQ@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <div class="gmail_extra">
                          <div class="gmail_quote">
                            <div> <br>
                            </div>
                            <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
                              style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px
                              #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                              <br>
                              This would also help enforce our
                              cherry-pick model of 'merge to master,
                              pick back to -release branches for
                              releases' and will provide us a feature
                              branch to branch off our '2.y-release'
                              branches<br>
                              without adding in confusion each .y cycle.<br>
                              <span class=""><br>
                                <br>
                                > Do our release engineering tools
                                support this change? If not, what would
                                it take to support it?<br>
                                <br>
                              </span>Yes.  There'd be some small changes
                              required to use the new master branch
                              insted of 'master', but that's it.<br>
                              <br>
                              > ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
                              > Pulp-dev mailing list<br>
                              > <a href="mailto:Pulp-dev@redhat.com"
                                moz-do-not-send="true">Pulp-dev@redhat.com</a><br>
                              > <a
                                href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev"
                                rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                                moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.redhat.com/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev</a><br>
                              ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
                              Pulp-dev mailing list<br>
                              <a href="mailto:Pulp-dev@redhat.com"
                                moz-do-not-send="true">Pulp-dev@redhat.com</a><br>
                              <a
                                href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev"
                                rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                                moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.redhat.com/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev</a><br>
                              <br>
                            </blockquote>
                          </div>
                          <br>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Pulp-dev@redhat.com">Pulp-dev@redhat.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>