[Pulp-list] How about we just merge these core features into Cobbler?

Mairin Duffy duffy at redhat.com
Fri Sep 12 17:05:31 UTC 2008

Michael DeHaan wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply, I was looking over the pulp features list up 
> on the Wiki a few weeks ago.
> Serious question -- it seems the features mentioned for Pulp (other than 
> interface features) are suitable to be added to Cobbler in ways that 
> requires people use less tools

Where would the interface live, then?

On top as a separate piece, making calls to a cobbler server? Does that 
mean pulp would be the interface piece only?


More information about the Pulp-list mailing list