[Pulp-list] How about we just merge these core features into Cobbler?
Mairin Duffy
duffy at redhat.com
Fri Sep 12 17:05:31 UTC 2008
Michael DeHaan wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply, I was looking over the pulp features list up
> on the Wiki a few weeks ago.
>
> Serious question -- it seems the features mentioned for Pulp (other than
> interface features) are suitable to be added to Cobbler in ways that
> requires people use less tools
Where would the interface live, then?
On top as a separate piece, making calls to a cobbler server? Does that
mean pulp would be the interface piece only?
~m
More information about the Pulp-list
mailing list