[Pulp-list] How about we just merge these core features into Cobbler?
bkearney at redhat.com
Fri Sep 12 19:56:08 UTC 2008
Michael DeHaan wrote:
> Máirín Duffy wrote:
>> Michael DeHaan wrote:
>>> Máirín Duffy wrote:
>>> I think we are stuck in metaphor land :)
> (A) Making a new web app, possibly to be included with and/or replace
> parts of Spacewalk
> (B) Adding some repo management features that Cobbler can't do yet ...
> whether that be in cobbler or otherwise
So.. for the Appliance Developers Kit, I think that I want most of what
without the Tracking/Accessing bits. I could look to Cobbler for this.,,
or Pulp. I wonder if it makes sense to re-phrase the discussion to say
that there is an api and daemo (wether based on existing pulp or
existing cobbler) that does _only_ repo mirroring.
Then cobbler and spacewalk could be built on top of that?
Then, alot of the fancier stuff (
part of spacewalk.
I think we are having issues because of the overlap of features (see
attached). If we pull out the repo stuff (and only that) it may make it
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 25981 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Pulp-list