[Pulp-list] How about we just merge these core features into Cobbler?

Bryan Kearney bkearney at redhat.com
Fri Sep 12 19:56:08 UTC 2008

Michael DeHaan wrote:
> Máirín Duffy wrote:
>> Michael DeHaan wrote:
>>> Máirín Duffy wrote:
>>> I think we are stuck in metaphor land :)

> (A)  Making a new web app, possibly to be included with and/or replace 
> parts of Spacewalk
> (B)  Adding some repo management features that Cobbler can't do yet ... 
> whether that be in cobbler or otherwise

So.. for the Appliance Developers Kit, I think that I want most of what 
is here:


without the Tracking/Accessing bits. I could look to Cobbler for this.,, 
or Pulp. I wonder if it makes sense to re-phrase the discussion to say 
that there is an api and daemo (wether based on existing pulp or 
existing cobbler) that does _only_ repo mirroring.

Then cobbler and spacewalk could be built on top of that?

Then, alot of the fancier stuff (
https://fedorahosted.org/pulp/wiki/WebInterfaceMockupsSystem) becomes 
part of spacewalk.

I think we are having issues because of the overlap of features (see 
attached). If we pull out the repo stuff (and only that) it may make it 
alot easier.

-- bk

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: issue..jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 25981 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20080912/32700976/attachment.jpg>

More information about the Pulp-list mailing list