[Pulp-list] Asynchronous Task Dispatching
Jason L Connor
jconnor at redhat.com
Thu Apr 14 20:42:47 UTC 2011
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 13:07 -0700, Mike McCune wrote:
> so, does this mean when I initiate a new sync I may have to wait up
> to
> 30 seconds to start seeing things happen? If that is the case I'd
> have
> to give a thumbs down. UIs relying on Pulp to sync content waiting
> 30
> seconds for any kind of updates seems pretty sluggish.
See my reply to Jay's email. An on-demand kick of the dispatcher thread
will mean that, in general, a repo sync will get started immediately.
--
Jason L Connor
linear on freenode #pulp
http://pulpproject.org/
RHCE: 805010912355231
GPG Fingerprint: 2048R/CC4ED7C1
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20110414/726938f3/attachment.sig>
More information about the Pulp-list
mailing list