[Pulp-list] Feedback on sync_repo() result reporting for v2 plugins

[Jay Dobies]

On 12/13/2011 04:28 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 12/14/2011 06:49 AM, Jay Dobies wrote:
>> I'm not ignoring this, I'm just so deep into the unit association stuff
>> that I'm afraid I'd do physical damage to my brain if I were to try to
>> shift gears and think about this. I'll take a look in the next few days.
>
> No worries - the "jam it all into the exception message" approach is a
> tolerable workaround for the moment, since the key requirement is for
> admins to be able to see the partial sync logs for jobs that fail, so
> they have some chance of figuring out what went wrong.
>
> I just wanted to bring it up as something to look at before the plugin
> APIs are declared stable.

Well there's the trick. I'm gonna go the Google route and call them 
"beta" for as long as possible so I can always make these changes and 
tell people the APIs were never stable.  :)

> Cheers,
> Nick.
>


-- 
Jay Dobies
Freenode: jdob @ #pulp
http://pulpproject.org | http://blog.pulpproject.org