[Pulp-list] What do you want from an API documentation solution?

Jason L Connor jconnor at redhat.com
Tue Nov 15 20:38:08 UTC 2011


On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 15:33 -0500, Jay Dobies wrote:
> Yes, in hindsight my reply sounded more definitive than I meant it
> to. 
> I'm not saying we close the book on the discussion, more than I need
> to 
> give sphinx more of a chance than my initial impressions would lead
> me 
> to have.
> 
> We'll do a deep dive on it after I do one on the repo REST APIs. 


Cool. Thanks Jay.

-- 
Jason L Connor
linear on freenode #pulp
http://pulpproject.org/
RHCE: 805010912355231
GPG Fingerprint: 2048R/CC4ED7C1
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20111115/071bb745/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pulp-list mailing list